← All lessons
Year 6 Science · Can we get it back? · Lesson 5 of 7

Reading the evidence

Five weeks of data, and somebody else's method to pull apart

AC9S6U04 AC9S6I04 AC9S6I05 90 minutes Term 4 · Week 5 ★ Assessment CP2
Drag the timer by its title bar to move it. Double-click the bar to send it back.

Teaching notes

Read before the lesson. Hidden from students when teacher mode is off.

Where this sits The biggest lesson in the unit, and the one everything since Week 1 has been building toward. The nails come out heavier, which is the single most convincing evidence a Year 6 student can personally generate that an irreversible change makes a new substance. Then each class pulls apart the other's method, which is the half of the evaluation criterion that cannot be faked. CP2 is written at the end.

The number that decides whether this works

Three 65 mm nails weigh about 13.8 g. A realistic mass gain over five weeks is:

Iron convertedMass gainedOn 0.01 g scales
0.5% — light rust0.03 g3 divisions
1%0.06 g6 divisions
2% — typical Jar B0.12 g12 divisions
5% — heavy rust0.30 g30 divisions

Readable, and comfortably so. On 1 g scales every one of those rounds to zero, which is why the 0.01 g scales matter today and nowhere else in the unit.

Drying is not fussiness — it is the experiment A single drop of water left on the nails weighs 0.05 g. That is five divisions — bigger than the entire signal from a lightly rusted jar. Half a millilitre is 50 divisions and would invent a result several times larger than the real one.

Dry properly: rinse briefly under the tap, blot hard with paper towel, then spread on a tray in the sun or in the frypan on low for a few minutes. Leave them until they look and feel completely dry, then leave them a bit longer. Weigh the Jar A dry control alongside — it should read within a division or two of its setup mass. If it has gained, your drying has failed and every other number is wrong.

The two moments that matter

1 · When the first group reads a bigger number

Stop the room. Ask what they expected. Almost everyone predicts lighter, because rust flakes off and looks like decay. Heavier is genuinely surprising. Then: where did the extra mass come from? Nothing was added to a sealed jar. It came out of the air, and it is now part of the nail. That is Lesson 2's logic running in reverse — mass went up, so something joined.

2 · When they get the other class's data

Students will critique another class in ways they will never critique their friends, and they cannot fall back on "I know what we meant." Insist on written critiques before any discussion. The writing is the assessment evidence; the discussion afterwards is where they find out whether they were right.

Running the weigh-in

  • Do the drying first, before anything else. Fifteen minutes of lesson time is the drying. Get nails out and onto trays in the first five minutes.
  • Tongs or gloves only. Rusted nails are sharp and carry a tetanus risk. Count them out and count them back in.
  • One weighing station. Two scales, six groups, three jars each — that is 18 weighings per class. Queue them; do not try to run it in parallel with other work.
  • Record to 0.01 g. Two decimal places, every time, including trailing zeros. 13.80 g is a different statement from 13.8 g.
  • Vinegar jars will misbehave. Jar E often loses mass, because acid dissolves iron away rather than just oxidising it. That is a real result and worth naming, not hiding.
If the drying fails or the scales have not arrived Run the whole analysis on the coverage ratings instead. They are five weeks of honest data and they answer the question perfectly well. Say plainly what went wrong and why the mass numbers cannot be trusted. A teacher modelling an honest account of a failed measurement is worth more here than clean data — and it is exactly the reasoning CP3 asks students to do.

What the data should show

Tuesday — what causes rustExpected
B — half-submergedMost rust. Water and oxygen together at the waterline.
D — salt waterClose second. Salt speeds up the reaction.
C — fully submergedLess than B. Limited oxygen.
E — vinegarErratic. May lose mass as iron dissolves.
A — dry sealedAlmost none. No water.
F — boiled water under oilAlmost none. No oxygen.

B beating C is the result that teaches. Students predicted more water means more rust. A and F together establish that rusting needs both water and oxygen — remove either and it stops.

Running CP2

  • Groups draft the plan together; each student submits their own.
  • The peer critique happens before submission and is written on the proforma. That box is assessable — it shows whether the student could take a criticism and act on it.
  • Approve every plan before Week 6. A plan you have not signed off is a group that cannot start.
  • Fifteen minutes is enough to draft, not to polish. Finishing at home or in a spare slot is fine.
The discriminator in CP2 An A-grade plan names controlled variables that would actually wreck the result — nail size, water volume, position on the shelf, start date. A C-grade plan lists whatever comes to mind. The difference is whether the student is thinking about their own method or reciting a category.

Misconceptions to expect

MisconceptionHow it shows todayResponse
Rusting makes metal lighterPredicting a loss before the weigh-inThe scale. Rust is made from the iron plus something from the air, and it stays attached.
Rust is dirt sitting on the surface"You could scrub it off"The nail is heavier than the steel it started as. You cannot scrub something off and end up with more.
More water means more rustPredicting C beats BThe data. Rusting needs water and oxygen together, and the waterline has both.

What comes next

Lesson 6 is the assessment investigation. Every plan needs signing off before then, and the equipment for each group's chosen variable needs to be available. Check the approved list against what groups have actually asked for.

Overview

Five weeks of waiting ends today. The nails come out, they go on the good scales, and the number is not what anyone expects.

What we are doing today

Five weeks ago you sealed nails in jars. Today they come out and go on the scales.

They weigh more than when they went in. Rust did not take anything off the nail — it added something to it. Working out where the extra mass came from tells you what rust actually is.

Then you graph it. Your own three jars first, then all six conditions from the whole class on one graph, so you can see which ones did the damage. Those graphs go to the other class next week, so they have to make sense to somebody who was not here.

In the last 25 minutes you plan the investigation you run next week.

Shape of the lesson

PhaseTimeWhat happens
The weigh-in15 minNails out, rinsed, dried, weighed to 0.01 g against the setup mass.
Graph it30 minEach group graphs its three jars, then the class pools all six conditions. These graphs are handed to the other class next week, so they have to be readable by someone who was not here.
The cross explained20 minWhy the nails gained mass. Then why somebody wanted the cross to do this.
★ CP225 minInvestigation plan drafted in groups, peer-critiqued, submitted individually.
Get the nails drying immediately The drying is the lesson's critical path. Nails out and onto trays in the first five minutes, then let them dry while you set up the graphing. A wet nail reads five divisions heavy per drop, which is bigger than the whole signal on a lightly rusted jar.

If you are teaching this cold

The whole lesson in order. Each step has its own tab above with the detail.

StepYou doStudents do
1. The weigh-in
15 min
Rusted nails are sharp, so tongs or gloves, counted out and counted back. Have drying trays and the frypan on low ready. Drying is the experiment — one drop of water weighs 0.05 g, which is bigger than the whole result. Nails out, rinsed, blotted, dried properly, then weighed to 0.01 g against their Week 1 mass. The nails are heavier.
2. Graph it
30 min
Pool all six conditions on the board once groups have their own three. These graphs go to the other class next week, so push for labels, units and a title. Graph their three jars, then help build the class graph. Make it good enough for someone who was not here to read.
3. The cross explained
20 min
Iron plus oxygen makes iron oxide, and the oxygen came out of the air in the jar — that is why the nail is heavier. Then answer the question left hanging since Week 1. Work out why rust on ordinary steel never stops, and why the cross was built from steel chosen to rust.
4. CP2
25 min
Summative. Proforma and marking guide come from the Assessment Pack, not this site. Every plan needs approving before next week. Draft the investigation plan in groups, get one hard question from another group, then write and submit their own.

Everything you need

Prepare before the lesson

  • Check the 0.01 g scales work and read zero
  • Set out drying trays lined with paper towel, one per group
  • Frypan on low, or a sunny windowsill spot cleared
  • Print the graph frames, critique proformas and CP2 proformas
  • Have each class's Week 1 setup masses ready to hand back
  • Print or display the other class's raw data — with no method attached
  • Photograph of the cross, and the client's asset, ready

For the weigh-in

  • 2 × scales, 0.01 g resolution
  • Tongs or disposable gloves — no bare hands
  • Drying trays and paper towel
  • Frypan on low (teacher-operated) or windowsill
  • Rigid sealed container for nail disposal
  • Safety glasses

Per student

  • Their group's rust log from Weeks 1–4
  • Graph frame (pre-scaled version available)
  • Method critique proforma
  • CP2 Investigation Plan proforma — from your Assessment Pack
  • Ruler, pencil, coloured pencils

Whole class

  • Criteria chart from Lessons 1, 2 and 4
  • Board space for the pooled six-condition data
  • The other class's raw dataset
  • Week 1 setup masses for every jar

Tidying up

  • Liquids down the sink with running water
  • Nails into a rigid sealed container, not loose waste
  • Jars washed, inspected, returned or discarded if chipped
  • Benches and sink cleaned after disposal

Not needed today

  • Frypan for cooking — only for drying, on low
  • Funnels, basins, thermometers
  • Any consumables: this is a data lesson

What we are learning

Learning intention

We are learning to turn our measurements into a graph that shows what the data actually says.

I will be successful when I can…

  • construct a graph that shows what my data actually says
  • describe a pattern or trend in the results
  • plan an investigation that another group could run

Stretch

  • I can tell a real difference from ordinary variation between my three jars.
  • I can say which of my six conditions the client actually needs to know about, and why.
Curriculum AC9S6I04 — construct and use appropriate representations, including tables and graphs, to organise and process data and describe patterns, trends and relationships.
AC9S6I05 — recognise possible sources of error, pose questions for further investigation and select evidence to support reasoned conclusions.
AC9S6I03 — use equipment to observe, measure and record data with reasonable precision, using digital tools as appropriate.
Assessment today The last twenty-five minutes is your Investigation Plan for next week. You draft it as a group, another group reads it and asks one hard question, and then you submit your own. It has to be good enough for someone else to run.

Your goal for today

The weigh-in 15 min

Five weeks. Let us find out.

Safety first Rusted nails are sharp and rust carries a tetanus risk. Tongs or gloves only — never bare hands. Count your nails out and count them back in. Tell the teacher immediately if anyone gets scratched.

Getting them dry

  1. Lift your nails out with tongs. Keep each jar's three together and labelled.
  2. Rinse briefly under the tap.
  3. Blot hard with paper towel. Then blot again.
  4. Spread them on your tray and leave them to dry properly.

Why we are being this fussy about drying.

One drop of water weighs 0.05 g. The mass your nails have actually gained might only be 0.06 g. So a single drop left behind could double your result and you would never know. Water is not rust, and the scale cannot tell the difference.

Weighing

  1. Wait until the nails look and feel completely dry.
  2. Weigh all three together, exactly as you did in Week 1.
  3. Record to two decimal places, always — 13.80 g, not 13.8 g.
  4. Subtract the setup mass. That difference is your result.
The check that tells you whether to trust any of it The dry sealed jar should weigh what it weighed in Week 1, give or take a division. If it has gained, the drying has failed and every other number in the class is too high.

What happened?

  1. Did your nails get heavier, lighter, or stay the same?
  2. Is that what you expected five weeks ago?
  3. Nothing was added to your jar. So where did the extra mass come from?
Show the answers

1. Heavier — most conditions gain between 0.03 g and 0.30 g. The vinegar jar may lose mass, because acid dissolves iron away rather than just rusting it.

2. Almost nobody expects heavier. Rust flakes and looks like decay, so lighter feels obvious.

3. Out of the air. Rust is iron joined to oxygen, and the oxygen came from inside the jar. The nail is now iron plus something it collected — which is exactly why it weighs more. In Lesson 2 the mass dropped when a gas escaped. Here it rose because a gas joined.

This is the payoff of the whole unit Week 2 established that mass is conserved and a loss means something left. Here mass increases, which means something joined. The oxygen came from the air and is now part of the nail. It is the single most convincing piece of evidence a Year 6 student can personally generate that an irreversible change makes a new substance — and they generated it themselves over five weeks.

Graph it 20 min

Your three jars first

Plot your own condition. Three bars, one per jar.

  1. Are your three bars the same height?
  2. Should they be? You set all three up identically.
  3. How different would two jars have to be before you would say it was a real difference rather than just wobble?
Why we ran three If you had only run one jar, you would have no idea whether your number was typical or a fluke. Three tells you how much your own results wobble — and that tells you how big a difference has to be before it means anything.

Then the whole class

Six conditions on one graph. Use the average of each group's three jars.

  1. Which condition rusted the most?
  2. Which two conditions barely rusted at all? What do they have in common?
  3. Compare the half-submerged jar with the fully submerged one. Which won?
  4. Is that what you predicted in Week 1?
Show the answers — Tuesday, what causes rust

1. Jar B, half-submerged, usually by a clear margin. Salt water (D) is often close behind.

2. Jar A (dry, sealed) and Jar F (boiled water under oil). A had air but no water. F had water but no oxygen. Neither rusted, and between them they prove you need both.

3. Half-submerged beats fully submerged — which surprises nearly everyone.

4. Most people predicted more water means more rust. The waterline is where water and oxygen meet, and rusting needs both at once. Under the surface there is far less oxygen available.

Show the answers — Thursday, what stops rust

1. The bare control, by a long way. That is the point — everything else was trying to beat it.

2. The galvanised nail and whichever coating stayed intact. A tape or polish coating with a gap in it often does worse than expected, because water gets underneath and cannot dry out.

3–4. The useful surprise is that a damaged barrier can be worse than no barrier at all. That matters for the client's recommendation: a coating only works if it is complete and stays complete.

Draw out the A and F pair deliberately Two conditions that both failed to rust, for opposite reasons. Together they are a controlled experiment in miniature: remove water, nothing happens; remove oxygen, nothing happens. That is far stronger evidence than the winner, and students tend to skip straight past it to look at which bar is tallest.
Need a hand
  • Use the pre-scaled graph frame.
  • Plot your three jars, then the class averages.
Keep going
  • Build and scale both graphs yourself.
  • Write the pattern in words underneath.
Push me
  • Express the gain as a percentage of the starting mass. Does that change which condition won?
  • Is the gap between conditions bigger than the gap between your own three jars? What does your answer mean?

The cross explained 20 min

First — what actually happened to your nails

Iron + oxygen → iron oxide. That is rust.

The oxygen came out of the air in your jar. It is now locked into the surface of the nail, which is why the nail weighs more than the steel you started with. A new substance was made, and it was made from the nail.

  1. Why can you not scrub rust off and get your nail back to new?
  2. Rust flakes off and exposes fresh metal underneath. What happens next?
Show the answers

1. Because the rust is not sitting on the nail — it is made of the nail. Scrub it off and you take some of the nail with it. The iron that turned into rust is not coming back.

2. It rusts too. Then that flakes off, and the metal underneath rusts. On ordinary steel this never stops. Given enough time, there is no steel left.

If a group topped up more than others Jars were topped up to a marked line each week, so the water level was controlled even where jar sizes differed. A group that skipped a top-up has a nail that spent part of the fortnight dry — worth naming, because it is a real source of error they can point to rather than a vague one.

Now — the question from Week 1

The cross at our entrance has been rusting for years. Nobody has ever tried to stop it.

Somebody chose that. Why?

It is made from weathering steel, which has other metals mixed into it. It rusts like any steel — but then something different happens.

Ordinary steel1

Rust forms. It is flaky and loose.

It falls off, exposing clean metal.

That rusts too. It never stops.

Your client's asset is doing this right now.
Weathering steel2

Rust forms. It is tight and it sticks.

It seals the surface instead of falling off.

Water and air cannot get past it, so it stops.

The cross at our entrance.
  1. Both are irreversible changes. Why is one a problem and the other a solution?
  2. So does knowing a change is irreversible tell you whether it is bad?
  3. What would you need to know to decide?
Show the answers

1. Identical chemistry — iron and oxygen making iron oxide. The difference is what the rust does once it has formed. Loose rust keeps the reaction going. Tight rust shuts it down.

2. No. Irreversible means it cannot be undone. It says nothing about whether you wanted it.

3. What the change is for. Cooking, setting concrete and curing glue are all irreversible and all deliberate. The cross was designed to do this. The gate was not.

The idea this whole unit is built on An irreversible change can be exactly what you want — if you understand it well enough to control it. The people who built that cross knew precisely what would happen to it, and chose it anyway.
Optional — worth the two minutes if the room is with you A cross made of something that changes permanently and cannot be returned to what it was, placed at the entrance. You are already having this conversation when you take them out there. Offer it as a question rather than a point: why might someone choose that material for that object?

Words we have used

iron oxideoxygencorrosion galvanisedweathering steelsource of error trendreplicatecollaboration

★ Investigation Plan 15 min

Assessment. Drafted in your group, critiqued by another, submitted individually.

Next week you run your own investigation, and the results go to [CLIENT NAME].

The shared question is how to protect metal from rusting. Your group picks what to change. Your plan has to be good enough that another group could run it without asking you anything.

What the plan needs

  • Your question — naming what you will change and what you will measure
  • Your prediction, and the evidence from the last five weeks that led you to it
  • Your variables: changed, measured, and at least three controlled
  • Your method, numbered
  • How many times you will run it, and why that many
  • Your risks and what you will do about them
  • Your equipment
  • What another group asked, and what you changed because of it
The part people lose marks on Controlled variables. Do not list everything you can think of. List the things that would actually wreck your result if they were different — nail size, how much water, where the jars sit, what day you start. Ask yourself: if this changed, would my answer change?
You have done this before In Week 3 you drafted a method, handed it to another group and got one hard question back. Same protocol, higher stakes — and next week you hand your graphs to the other class for exactly this treatment. What would you attack?

Swap your plan

Draft it, hand it to another group, and get one hard question back. Write down what they asked and what you changed. That box is part of the assessment — it shows whether you can take a criticism and use it.

The proforma is not on this site CP2's proforma and marking guide are in the Assessment Pack on your own machine. This page is public and teacher mode only hides things with a style rule. Print from the pack.
Administration Groups of up to four draft together; every student submits their own plan. Peer critique before submission, written on the proforma. Approve every plan before Week 6 — an unapproved plan is a group that cannot start. Fifteen minutes is enough to draft but not to polish; finishing later is fine.

Next week

You run it. Bring your plan — you will be following it, and you will be watched while you do.

Resources

Print before the lesson.

PDF All student sheets Every sheet below in one file.

Individual sheets

CP2 is not published here The Investigation Plan proforma and its marking guide are deliberately absent from this site. Print them from the Assessment Pack on your own machine.
lessons/ └── 05-reading-the-evidence/ ├── lesson-05-reading-the-evidence.html this page └── resources/ ├── l5-00-all-student-sheets.pdf ├── l5-01-weigh-in-and-graph.pdf ├── l5-02-graph-frames-support.pdf └── l5-student-sheets-EDITABLE.docx
Lesson timer
The weigh-in
Phase 1 of 5
15:00
Elapsed 0:0090 min total
CP2 starts in 65:00