← All lessons
Year 6 Science · Can we get it back? · Lesson 4 of 7

The point of no return

How much heat turns a change of state into something new

AC9S6U04 AC9S6I03 AC9S6I04 90 minutes Term 4 · Week 4 ★ Assessment CP1
Drag the timer by its title bar to move it. Double-click the bar to send it back.

Teaching notes

Read before the lesson. Hidden from students when teacher mode is off.

Teacher mode is not security This page is public once it is on the web, and teacher mode only hides content with a style rule — anyone can read the source. That is why CP1's questions and marking guide are not on this page or in the resources folder. They live in the Assessment Pack on your own machine. Keep it that way.
Where this sits Two jobs today, and they are different jobs. The sugar demonstration does the curriculum elaboration directly — same substance, more heat, different outcome. The chocolate and egg white pairing kills the belief that hotter is what makes a change irreversible. Then CP1 banks the entire Science Understanding judgement, three weeks before the term gets busy.

The misconception this lesson exists to break

Students believe irreversible change requires extreme heat. Four weeks of burning, rusting and fizzing has quietly reinforced it. Two numbers undo it:

ChangeTemperatureVerdict
Chocolate melts34–38 °CReversible. Body temperature is 37 °C — it melts in your mouth by design.
Egg white setsabout 63 °CIrreversible. Well below boiling.
Water boils100 °CReversible. Hotter than both, and reverses completely.

An egg white cannot be un-cooked at a temperature where water is still comfortably liquid. Temperature is not the thing. What the substance is is the thing — and how much energy goes in decides which of its thresholds you cross.

Worth saying out loud about the chocolate Cocoa butter is one of very few fats that melts in the narrow band just below mouth temperature, and confectioners choose it for exactly that. Chocolate melting in your hand is not an accident or a flaw — it is the property the whole product is built around. A material selected for how it behaves when heated, which is the same idea as the resin adhesive in Lesson 3.

The two moments that matter

1 · When the sugar goes brown

There is a specific moment when it stops being sugar. Students mark it on their sheet as it happens, in real time, and commit to evidence. The ones to look for are those citing more than one thing — it went brown and it smells different and it will not go back when it cools. A student citing colour alone has a rule, not an understanding.

2 · When the egg white number goes on the board

Sixty-three degrees. Below boiling. Ask whether anyone can un-cook it. Then ask how a change that needs so little heat can be more permanent than boiling water. Sit in the discomfort — that is the concept arriving.

Running the sugar

  • Two tablespoons, spread thin. More than that and the middle burns before the edges melt. Small quantity also limits the smoke.
  • Medium-high. A frypan tops out around 200–230 °C, which reaches caramelisation at about 170 °C but does not race past it. If you use a hotplate instead, run it lower than you think — 300 °C-plus overshoots to black very quickly.
  • Do not stir at first. Let it go clear from the edges. Stirring early makes it seize into lumps.
  • Never put a thermometer probe into molten sugar. It is over 180 °C, it sticks, and it will drag hot sugar with it when removed. Read the pan setting and observe the sugar by eye. The probe is for the chocolate and the egg white, where it is safe and the numbers actually matter.
  • Stop at the first serious smoke. You have the result you need once it is dark brown. Black and smoking adds nothing except a smoke alarm.
The honest nuance on "melting" sugar Sugar does not cleanly melt the way ice does — decomposition begins around the same temperature as the apparent melting. For Year 6 the observable is what matters and it is sound: goes clear and runny, then sets hard again when it cools — still sugar, versus goes brown and smells different — not sugar any more. If a sharp student asks whether the clear stage is really reversible, that is an excellent question and the honest answer is "mostly, and it is more complicated than it looks." Do not pretend it is simple.
Safety — the highest-risk demonstration in the unit Molten sugar is above 180 °C and sticks to skin, which makes its burns far worse than boiling water. Strictly teacher-operated. One-metre exclusion line, students seated behind it for the whole demonstration. Safety glasses and heat-resistant gloves for you. Long hair tied back. Windows and door open before heating starts, and check where the smoke detector is — notify the office if it is nearby. Cold running water immediately available. Pan stays where it is to cool; do not carry hot residue across the room.
Allergens Egg today, and chocolate contains milk. Check both classes' allergy registers before you buy anything, and again on the morning. If anyone in either class is at risk, the sugar sequence carries the whole lesson on its own — the chocolate and egg pairing can be replaced with butter and a description of the egg result without losing the concept.

Running CP1

  • Thirty minutes, individual, silent, books closed. The word bank goes to everyone, not just the support tier.
  • Read aloud on request. Scribe where writing is not the criterion.
  • Part B asks students to compare two changes they investigated themselves. Have the criteria chart, the Week 2 mass results and the Week 3 yield numbers visible. This is not a memory test.
  • Collect and bank it. This is the entire Science Understanding judgement and it is done.
The discriminator in Part B A B-grade response describes change one, then change two. An A-grade response picks a criterion — can you get it back, did the mass alter, was a new substance made — and runs both changes through it. That structural difference is the clearest signal of purposeful comparison at this year level, and it is what separates thorough from informed in the elaborations.

Misconceptions to expect

MisconceptionHow it shows todayResponse
Hotter means more irreversiblePredicting the egg needs more heat than the chocolate to be permanentSixty-three degrees against a hundred for boiling. The egg wins on permanence and loses on temperature.
Melting is always reversibleApplied as a rule, including to the sugarMostly true — but watch what happens to sugar shortly after it goes runny. The melt is not the end of the story.
Colour change decides itMarking the transition purely on browningFood colouring in water changes colour and evaporates back. Colour is a clue, not a verdict.
Burnt sugar is still sugar, just dirty"You could clean it off"It smells different and tastes different because it is different. New substances were made, and no amount of cooling brings sugar back.

What comes next

Lesson 5 is the biggest of the unit: the rust jars come apart, the nails are weighed on the 0.01 g scales and come out heavier, both classes swap datasets, and CP2 is written. Make sure the scales have arrived and the drying trays are ready.

Overview

Heat something gently and it comes back. Heat it further and it does not. Today you find the moment in between.

What we are doing today

Everything gets heated today, and your job is to spot the moment a change stops being one you could undo.

Sugar goes in the pan first. It melts, then turns golden, then brown, then black and smoky. Somewhere along the way it stops being sugar. You decide where, and you say what convinced you.

Then chocolate and egg white, with a thermometer in each. Chocolate melts at about the temperature of your hand, and sets hard again when it cools. Egg white sets at around 63 degrees and never goes back — and that is cooler than boiling water, which you can undo. So the temperature on its own does not tell you which kind of change you are looking at.

The last half hour is your first assessment task.

Shape of the lesson

PhaseTimeWhat happens
Rust check5 minWeek 3 reading. Photograph, rate, record.
The sugar escalation30 minOne substance, more and more heat. Students mark the moment it stops being sugar.
Two thresholds15 minChocolate melts at body temperature. Egg white sets at 63 °C. One comes back, one does not.
Consolidate10 minAmend the criteria chart for the last time before the assessment.
★ CP130 minClassify and Compare. Individual, silent. Science Understanding banked.
Do not let CP1 slide If the demonstrations run long, cut the consolidate phase to five minutes and start CP1 on time. The entire Science Understanding judgement is in this thirty minutes, and it is being collected now precisely so that a chaotic Week 7 cannot cost you a whole strand.

If you are teaching this cold

The whole lesson in order. Each step has its own tab above with the detail.

StepYou doStudents do
1. Rust check
5 min
Last reading before the jars come apart. Tell them that next week the nails get weighed. Photograph, rate all three jars, top up to the marked line, record.
2. The sugar escalation
30 min
Teacher-run, students behind the one-metre line. Full steps are on the Sugar tab — spread the sugar thin, call each stage, lift a spoonful at stage 3 and another at stage 5, stop at first smoke. Record what they see, hear and smell at each stage on Part 1 of their sheet, then mark the stage where sugar stopped being sugar and say what convinced them.
3. Two thresholds
15 min
Teacher-run. Full steps are on the Thresholds tab — chocolate first on low, then egg white, calling the temperature at the moment each one changes. Write both temperatures on Part 3, then answer why you can un-boil water but not un-cook an egg.
4. Consolidate
10 min
Cross out "it got hot" on the criteria chart in front of them and write the replacement. Last edit before the assessment, so leave it up. Decide what should replace it, and write their answer on Part 4.
5. CP1
30 min
Summative. Silent, individual. Task and marking guide come from the Assessment Pack, not this site. Class charts and their own results from Weeks 2 and 3 stay on display. Classify and Compare. Their sheets from Weeks 2, 3 and today are allowed — it is a reasoning task, not a memory test.

Everything you need

Prepare before the lesson

  • Check both classes' allergy registers — egg and milk are used today
  • Measure 2 tablespoons of white sugar into a small dish
  • Break chocolate into small even pieces
  • Separate one egg white into a cup
  • Mark the one-metre exclusion line on the floor
  • Open windows, check where the smoke detector is, notify the office if it is close
  • Print the escalation sheets and the CP1 papers
  • Have the criteria chart, Week 2 mass results and Week 3 yields on display

Teacher bench

  • Electric frypan — you operate it, nobody else
  • Two digital instant-read thermometers
  • Heat-resistant gloves and tongs
  • Heat-resistant mat
  • Small metal dish or ramekin for the chocolate
  • Metal spoon for the egg white
  • Fire blanket and cold running water within reach

Consumables

  • White sugar — 2 tablespoons
  • Chocolate — a small handful
  • One egg
  • Paper towel

Per student

  • Heat escalation recording sheet
  • Supported version where needed
  • CP1 paper — from your Assessment Pack, not from this site
  • Word bank for CP1 — everyone gets one
  • Safety glasses are not required today: students observe, they do not handle

On display

  • Criteria chart from Lesson 1, as amended in Lesson 2
  • Week 2 mass results
  • Week 3 recovery yields, both methods
  • Rust jars and the coverage scale

Not needed today

  • Funnels, filter papers, evaporating basins — finished with
  • The 0.01 g scales — next week
  • Group equipment of any kind: this is a demonstration lesson

What we are learning

Learning intention

We are learning to compare a reversible and an irreversible change caused by adding heat.

I will be successful when I can…

  • describe what happens to a substance as more and more heat is added
  • identify the point at which a new substance has been made
  • classify a change and justify it with evidence, not with a rule
  • compare a reversible and an irreversible change

Stretch

  • I can explain why temperature on its own does not tell you whether a change is reversible.
  • I can organise a comparison around a criterion instead of describing each change in turn.
Curriculum AC9S6U04 — compare reversible changes, including dissolving and changes of state, and irreversible changes, including cooking and rusting that produce new substances. Elaboration: comparing how the amount of heat energy added affects whether a change in state or an irreversible change occurs.
AC9S6I03 — use equipment to observe, measure and record data with reasonable precision.
Assessment today The last thirty minutes is Classify and Compare. It covers everything from Week 1 to now. You will have the class charts and your own results from Weeks 2 and 3 in front of you — it is not a memory test, it is a reasoning test.

Your goal for today

Rust check 5 min

Week 3 reading. Second to last one.

Photograph, rate all three jars separately, record, top up to the marked line. Next week the jars come apart and the nails go on the scales.

Flag next week now Tell them the jars come apart next lesson and the nails get weighed. A week of quietly wondering what the nails will weigh is free thinking time, and it makes the mass gain land harder when it arrives.
Check the 0.01 g scales have arrived They were due 23 October. If they have not turned up, chase MTA today — next week's weigh-in is the payoff of the entire investigation and 1 g resolution will not resolve the mass gain on three nails.

The sugar escalation 30 min

One substance. More and more heat. Watch for the moment it stops being sugar.

Watch only Everybody stays behind the line, seated, for the whole demonstration. Melted sugar is hotter than boiling water and it sticks to skin. Nobody comes forward for any reason.

Your job

Record what you see, hear and smell at each stage.

Then mark the exact stage where you believe sugar stopped existing — and write the evidence that convinced you.

Running the sugar demonstration — step by step

On the bench: electric frypan, 2 tablespoons of white sugar in a small dish, a metal spoon, two saucers labelled stage 3 and stage 5, a heat-resistant mat, a wooden spoon for stirring, and the fire blanket within reach. Students seated behind the one-metre line.

  1. Before you switch on — tip the sugar into the cold frypan and spread it thin, no deeper than a few millimetres. Deep sugar burns at the bottom before the top has melted and you lose the middle stages. Point out the grainy white crystals: that is stage 1, and they record it now.
  2. Switch on, medium. Say out loud that nothing goes in or out of the pan from here. The whole thing takes about eight minutes, so keep talking and keep them recording.
  3. Call each stage as it arrives — "edges going clear, that's two", and so on. Give them fifteen seconds to write before you move on. Do not rush from 3 to 5; that stretch is the lesson.
  4. At stage 3, all liquid and still colourless — lift a spoonful onto the saucer marked stage 3 and set it aside to cool. Say what you are doing and why.
  5. At stage 5, definite amber — lift a second spoonful onto the saucer marked stage 5. The caramel smell should be obvious across the room by now. Ask them to write down what they can smell, because that is the evidence that matters.
  6. Take it to stage 6 — dark going black, sharp bitter smell, first wisps of smoke — then switch off and slide the pan off the element. Do not chase a blacker result. Once smoke appears you have what you need.
  7. While it cools, the two saucers go round the room on a tray, not in hands. Five minutes is enough for them to set hard. Nobody tastes anything.
  8. Leave the pan to cool completely before it goes near water. Hot sugar and water spits.

Thermometer stays out of the sugar. Molten sugar is over 180 °C, it sticks to the probe and drags hot sugar with it when you lift it. The temperatures in this lesson come from the chocolate and the egg, not the sugar.

The stages

StageWhat is happeningWhat to look for
1Cold sugarWhite, grainy, separate crystals. Smells of almost nothing.
2Edges go clearThe outside turns glassy and starts to run. Still colourless.
3All liquidClear, runny, like syrup. Bubbles at the edges.
4First colourA straw tint creeping in. The smell begins to change.
5AmberDefinite brown. Strong caramel smell across the room.
6DarkDeep brown going black. Sharp, bitter smell. First wisps of smoke.

The test

Answer on your sheet Part 1 and Part 2 of your Lesson 4 sheet in OneNote — the stage table, the stage where sugar stopped existing, and the two cooled samples.

A spoonful is taken out at stage 3 and left to cool. Another is taken out at stage 5.

Once they are cool: which one is still sugar?

  1. What did the stage 3 sample look like once it cooled?
  2. What did the stage 5 sample look like?
  3. Which stage did you mark as the point of no return, and why?
  4. The sugar got liquid at stage 3 and it got liquid at stage 5. Why is only one of those reversible?
  5. If you kept heating past stage 6, would you ever get sugar back?
Show the answers

1. Hard, clear or slightly cloudy, glassy. It looks different from the grainy powder it started as, but it is still sugar — it tastes of sugar and nothing new has been made.

2. Hard, brown, and it smells of caramel rather than of nothing. It is not sugar any more.

3. Somewhere between stage 4 and stage 5. The evidence to look for is more than one thing at once: the colour changed and the smell changed and it does not go back.

4. At stage 3 the sugar changed state — same substance, different form, and cooling reverses it. By stage 5 the heat has broken the sugar apart and built new substances, which is why it smells different. A change of state can be undone. A new substance cannot be un-made.

5. No. It keeps decomposing until what is left is mostly carbon — the black stuff. Every step takes it further away.

This is the elaboration, exactly "Comparing how the amount of heat energy added affects whether a change in state or an irreversible change occurs." One substance, one heat source, two completely different outcomes decided purely by how much energy went in. There is no cleaner demonstration of it available in a primary classroom.
If a student asks whether stage 3 is really reversible Excellent question, and the honest answer is "mostly, and it is more complicated than it looks." Sugar does not cleanly melt the way ice does — some decomposition starts around the same temperature. Do not pretend it is simple. Saying "you have found the edge of what this model handles" respects the question and is true.
Need a hand
  • Use the sheet with the stages already listed.
  • Tick what you notice, then mark one transition point.
Keep going
  • Record at every stage.
  • Mark the transition and write your evidence.
Push me
  • Argue that the transition happened one stage earlier or later than the class agreed, and defend it.

Two thresholds 15 min

Now two different substances — and this time we measure the temperature.

Chocolate1

Heated gently in a metal dish with the thermometer in it. Call out when it starts to go.

Then it comes off the heat and cools.

At what temperature did it melt?

Chocolate, metal dish, thermometer. Teacher operates.
Egg white2

Heated gently with the thermometer in it. Call out the moment it turns white.

Then it comes off the heat and cools.

At what temperature did it set?

One egg white, metal spoon or dish, thermometer. Teacher operates.
Running the two temperature demonstrations — step by step

On the bench: the frypan on low, two small metal dishes, one digital thermometer per dish if you have two, a few pieces of broken chocolate, one egg white in a cup, and a spoon. Same exclusion line, students seated.

Chocolate first — about 5 minutes

  1. Three or four small pieces in the metal dish, thermometer probe resting in among them, dish into the frypan on low. Low matters: chocolate scorches and then you are demonstrating the wrong change.
  2. Read the temperature aloud every thirty seconds and have them write the numbers as you go.
  3. The moment the pieces lose their edges and slump, call the temperature. Expect somewhere between 34 and 38 °C. That is the number that goes on their sheet.
  4. Dish out of the pan, onto the mat. Say you will come back to it — it needs a few minutes to set again, and it will.

Egg white second — about 6 minutes

  1. A tablespoon of egg white into the second dish, probe in the middle of it, into the frypan on low.
  2. Read the temperature aloud as it climbs. It will sit around 50-something for a while and look like nothing is happening. Let that silence run — the contrast with what comes next is the point.
  3. The instant it turns opaque white, call the temperature. Expect about 63 °C. Write it on the board beside 100 °C for boiling water, and leave both numbers there through CP1.
  4. Out of the pan, onto the mat, next to the chocolate.

Then show both — the chocolate has hardened again, and the egg has not gone anywhere. Carry them round on the tray. That side-by-side is what makes the point, so do not skip it for time.

If a thermometer reads oddly, say so rather than adjusting the number. An honest "that reading does not look right, let's take it again" is worth more than a tidy figure, and Week 5 is built on trusting your instrument.

Put the numbers up

Answer on your sheet Part 3 — fill in the two temperatures as they are measured, then the four questions underneath.
ChangeTemperatureDid it come back?
Chocolate melted
Egg white set
Water boils100 °CYes — steam condenses back to water
  1. Which of these needed the least heat?
  2. Which one is permanent?
  3. The egg set at a lower temperature than boiling water. So why can you un-boil water but not un-cook an egg?
  4. Does knowing the temperature tell you whether a change is reversible?
Show the answers

1. The chocolate, somewhere around 34–38 °C. Body temperature is 37 °C, so it melts at roughly the temperature of your own mouth — which is exactly why it melts in your hand and on your tongue.

2. The egg white, at around 63 °C. Still well below boiling.

3. Because boiling only changes water's state — it is still water, whether liquid or steam, and cooling brings it straight back. Cooking the egg builds something new out of what was there. Cooling cannot un-build it.

4. No. Not on its own. Temperature tells you how much energy went in. What happens depends on the substance and on which of its thresholds that energy crosses.

An egg cannot be un-cooked at a temperature where water is still perfectly happy being liquid.

Why chocolate melts in your hand Your body sits at about 37 °C, and chocolate melts somewhere around 34 to 38 °C. That is not a coincidence. The fat in chocolate — cocoa butter — is one of the very few that melts in that narrow band, and chocolate makers use it for precisely that reason. Melting in your mouth is the whole point of the product.
This is the whole point of the phase Four weeks of burning, rusting and fizzing has quietly taught the class that irreversible means extreme. Sixty-three degrees against a hundred breaks it in one line. Write both numbers on the board and leave them there through CP1.
Thermometer use The probe goes into the chocolate and the egg white, where it is safe and the readings matter. It never goes into molten sugar — that is over 180 °C, it sticks, and it drags hot sugar out with it.

Consolidate 10 min

Amend the chart

Answer on your sheet Part 4 — one question. Write it before CP1 starts, because you may use your sheet during the assessment.

Four weeks ago you listed the evidence that something new has been made. In Week 2 you added the mass changed. Today it changes again.

  1. Should it got hot stay on the list as evidence of a new substance?
  2. What would you replace it with?
Where this is going

Heat on its own is not evidence — ice melts when it is heated and nothing new is made. What today showed is subtler and more useful:

Adding heat can cause either kind of change. What decides it is the substance, and how much energy goes in.

Physically edit the chart in front of them Cross the old line out, write the new one. Students need to see a list being changed by evidence they generated — that is what makes it a working tool rather than wallpaper. It is also the last edit before the assessment, so leave it visible.

Where we have got to

  1. To tell whether something new was made, you need more than one piece of evidence.
  2. Mass is the strongest evidence, because it is a number rather than an opinion.
  3. The clearest question is still: can we get it back?
  4. Heat can cause either kind of change. How much you add decides which.

Words we have used

reversibleirreversiblechange of state meltdissolvecaramelise new substanceevidencepermanent

★ Classify and Compare 30 min

Assessment. Individual, silent, books closed.

This covers everything from Week 1 until now.

You are not being tested on remembering. The class charts and your own results from Weeks 2 and 3 stay on display. You are being assessed on whether you can classify a change and say what evidence decided it — and whether you can compare two changes properly.

What is on the paper

  • Part A — eight changes to classify, each with the one piece of evidence that decided it. A tick with no evidence does not count.
  • Part B — compare one reversible and one irreversible change that you investigated yourself in this unit.
  • Part C — the cross at our entrance.
How to do well in Part B A weak comparison describes the first change, then describes the second. A strong one picks something to compare them on — can you get it back, did the mass change, was a new substance made — and runs both changes through it. Use your own numbers from Weeks 2 and 3.
Adjustments The word bank goes to everyone. Ask if you want the paper read aloud. If writing is the thing slowing you down rather than the thinking, say so — it can be scribed.
The task itself is not on this site CP1's questions and marking guide are in the Assessment Pack on your own machine, deliberately. This page is public and teacher mode only hides things with a style rule — it does not protect them. Print from the pack.
Administration Thirty minutes, individual, silent. Books closed but the wall charts and Week 2 and 3 results stay up — this assesses reasoning, not recall. Read aloud on request; scribe where writing is not the criterion being judged. Collect and bank it: this is the whole Science Understanding judgement, done, three weeks before the term gets difficult.

Next week

The biggest lesson of the unit. The jars come apart, the nails go on the good scales, and something happens to the numbers that nobody is expecting. Then you get the other class's data and have to find what is wrong with it.

Resources

Print before the lesson.

PDF All student sheets Both versions of the escalation sheet in one file.

Individual sheets

CP1 is not published here The assessment task and its marking guide are deliberately absent from this site. Print them from the Assessment Pack on your own machine.
lessons/ └── 04-point-of-no-return/ ├── lesson-04-point-of-no-return.html this page └── resources/ ├── l4-00-all-student-sheets.pdf ├── l4-01-heat-escalation-sheet.pdf ├── l4-02-heat-escalation-support.pdf └── l4-student-sheets-EDITABLE.docx
Lesson timer
Rust check
Phase 1 of 5
5:00
Elapsed 0:0090 min total
CP1 starts in 60:00