Teaching notes
Read before the lesson. Hidden from students when teacher mode is off.
The misconception this lesson exists to break
Students believe irreversible change requires extreme heat. Four weeks of burning, rusting and fizzing has quietly reinforced it. Two numbers undo it:
| Change | Temperature | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Chocolate melts | 34–38 °C | Reversible. Body temperature is 37 °C — it melts in your mouth by design. |
| Egg white sets | about 63 °C | Irreversible. Well below boiling. |
| Water boils | 100 °C | Reversible. Hotter than both, and reverses completely. |
An egg white cannot be un-cooked at a temperature where water is still comfortably liquid. Temperature is not the thing. What the substance is is the thing — and how much energy goes in decides which of its thresholds you cross.
The two moments that matter
1 · When the sugar goes brown
There is a specific moment when it stops being sugar. Students mark it on their sheet as it happens, in real time, and commit to evidence. The ones to look for are those citing more than one thing — it went brown and it smells different and it will not go back when it cools. A student citing colour alone has a rule, not an understanding.
2 · When the egg white number goes on the board
Sixty-three degrees. Below boiling. Ask whether anyone can un-cook it. Then ask how a change that needs so little heat can be more permanent than boiling water. Sit in the discomfort — that is the concept arriving.
Running the sugar
- Two tablespoons, spread thin. More than that and the middle burns before the edges melt. Small quantity also limits the smoke.
- Medium-high. A frypan tops out around 200–230 °C, which reaches caramelisation at about 170 °C but does not race past it. If you use a hotplate instead, run it lower than you think — 300 °C-plus overshoots to black very quickly.
- Do not stir at first. Let it go clear from the edges. Stirring early makes it seize into lumps.
- Never put a thermometer probe into molten sugar. It is over 180 °C, it sticks, and it will drag hot sugar with it when removed. Read the pan setting and observe the sugar by eye. The probe is for the chocolate and the egg white, where it is safe and the numbers actually matter.
- Stop at the first serious smoke. You have the result you need once it is dark brown. Black and smoking adds nothing except a smoke alarm.
Running CP1
- Thirty minutes, individual, silent, books closed. The word bank goes to everyone, not just the support tier.
- Read aloud on request. Scribe where writing is not the criterion.
- Part B asks students to compare two changes they investigated themselves. Have the criteria chart, the Week 2 mass results and the Week 3 yield numbers visible. This is not a memory test.
- Collect and bank it. This is the entire Science Understanding judgement and it is done.
Misconceptions to expect
| Misconception | How it shows today | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Hotter means more irreversible | Predicting the egg needs more heat than the chocolate to be permanent | Sixty-three degrees against a hundred for boiling. The egg wins on permanence and loses on temperature. |
| Melting is always reversible | Applied as a rule, including to the sugar | Mostly true — but watch what happens to sugar shortly after it goes runny. The melt is not the end of the story. |
| Colour change decides it | Marking the transition purely on browning | Food colouring in water changes colour and evaporates back. Colour is a clue, not a verdict. |
| Burnt sugar is still sugar, just dirty | "You could clean it off" | It smells different and tastes different because it is different. New substances were made, and no amount of cooling brings sugar back. |
What comes next
Lesson 5 is the biggest of the unit: the rust jars come apart, the nails are weighed on the 0.01 g scales and come out heavier, both classes swap datasets, and CP2 is written. Make sure the scales have arrived and the drying trays are ready.
Overview
Heat something gently and it comes back. Heat it further and it does not. Today you find the moment in between.
What we are doing today
Everything gets heated today, and your job is to spot the moment a change stops being one you could undo.
Sugar goes in the pan first. It melts, then turns golden, then brown, then black and smoky. Somewhere along the way it stops being sugar. You decide where, and you say what convinced you.
Then chocolate and egg white, with a thermometer in each. Chocolate melts at about the temperature of your hand, and sets hard again when it cools. Egg white sets at around 63 degrees and never goes back — and that is cooler than boiling water, which you can undo. So the temperature on its own does not tell you which kind of change you are looking at.
The last half hour is your first assessment task.
Shape of the lesson
| Phase | Time | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Rust check | 5 min | Week 3 reading. Photograph, rate, record. |
| The sugar escalation | 30 min | One substance, more and more heat. Students mark the moment it stops being sugar. |
| Two thresholds | 15 min | Chocolate melts at body temperature. Egg white sets at 63 °C. One comes back, one does not. |
| Consolidate | 10 min | Amend the criteria chart for the last time before the assessment. |
| ★ CP1 | 30 min | Classify and Compare. Individual, silent. Science Understanding banked. |
If you are teaching this cold
The whole lesson in order. Each step has its own tab above with the detail.
| Step | You do | Students do |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Rust check 5 min |
Last reading before the jars come apart. Tell them that next week the nails get weighed. | Photograph, rate all three jars, top up to the marked line, record. |
| 2. The sugar escalation 30 min |
Teacher-run, students behind the one-metre line. Full steps are on the Sugar tab — spread the sugar thin, call each stage, lift a spoonful at stage 3 and another at stage 5, stop at first smoke. | Record what they see, hear and smell at each stage on Part 1 of their sheet, then mark the stage where sugar stopped being sugar and say what convinced them. |
| 3. Two thresholds 15 min |
Teacher-run. Full steps are on the Thresholds tab — chocolate first on low, then egg white, calling the temperature at the moment each one changes. | Write both temperatures on Part 3, then answer why you can un-boil water but not un-cook an egg. |
| 4. Consolidate 10 min |
Cross out "it got hot" on the criteria chart in front of them and write the replacement. Last edit before the assessment, so leave it up. | Decide what should replace it, and write their answer on Part 4. |
| 5. CP1 30 min |
Summative. Silent, individual. Task and marking guide come from the Assessment Pack, not this site. Class charts and their own results from Weeks 2 and 3 stay on display. | Classify and Compare. Their sheets from Weeks 2, 3 and today are allowed — it is a reasoning task, not a memory test. |
Everything you need
Prepare before the lesson
- Check both classes' allergy registers — egg and milk are used today
- Measure 2 tablespoons of white sugar into a small dish
- Break chocolate into small even pieces
- Separate one egg white into a cup
- Mark the one-metre exclusion line on the floor
- Open windows, check where the smoke detector is, notify the office if it is close
- Print the escalation sheets and the CP1 papers
- Have the criteria chart, Week 2 mass results and Week 3 yields on display
Teacher bench
- Electric frypan — you operate it, nobody else
- Two digital instant-read thermometers
- Heat-resistant gloves and tongs
- Heat-resistant mat
- Small metal dish or ramekin for the chocolate
- Metal spoon for the egg white
- Fire blanket and cold running water within reach
Consumables
- White sugar — 2 tablespoons
- Chocolate — a small handful
- One egg
- Paper towel
Per student
- Heat escalation recording sheet
- Supported version where needed
- CP1 paper — from your Assessment Pack, not from this site
- Word bank for CP1 — everyone gets one
- Safety glasses are not required today: students observe, they do not handle
On display
- Criteria chart from Lesson 1, as amended in Lesson 2
- Week 2 mass results
- Week 3 recovery yields, both methods
- Rust jars and the coverage scale
Not needed today
- Funnels, filter papers, evaporating basins — finished with
- The 0.01 g scales — next week
- Group equipment of any kind: this is a demonstration lesson
What we are learning
Learning intention
We are learning to compare a reversible and an irreversible change caused by adding heat.
I will be successful when I can…
- describe what happens to a substance as more and more heat is added
- identify the point at which a new substance has been made
- classify a change and justify it with evidence, not with a rule
- compare a reversible and an irreversible change
Stretch
- I can explain why temperature on its own does not tell you whether a change is reversible.
- I can organise a comparison around a criterion instead of describing each change in turn.
AC9S6I03 — use equipment to observe, measure and record data with reasonable precision.
Your goal for today
Rust check 5 min
Week 3 reading. Second to last one.
Photograph, rate all three jars separately, record, top up to the marked line. Next week the jars come apart and the nails go on the scales.
The sugar escalation 30 min
One substance. More and more heat. Watch for the moment it stops being sugar.
Your job
Record what you see, hear and smell at each stage.
Then mark the exact stage where you believe sugar stopped existing — and write the evidence that convinced you.
Running the sugar demonstration — step by step
On the bench: electric frypan, 2 tablespoons of white sugar in a small dish, a metal spoon, two saucers labelled stage 3 and stage 5, a heat-resistant mat, a wooden spoon for stirring, and the fire blanket within reach. Students seated behind the one-metre line.
- Before you switch on — tip the sugar into the cold frypan and spread it thin, no deeper than a few millimetres. Deep sugar burns at the bottom before the top has melted and you lose the middle stages. Point out the grainy white crystals: that is stage 1, and they record it now.
- Switch on, medium. Say out loud that nothing goes in or out of the pan from here. The whole thing takes about eight minutes, so keep talking and keep them recording.
- Call each stage as it arrives — "edges going clear, that's two", and so on. Give them fifteen seconds to write before you move on. Do not rush from 3 to 5; that stretch is the lesson.
- At stage 3, all liquid and still colourless — lift a spoonful onto the saucer marked stage 3 and set it aside to cool. Say what you are doing and why.
- At stage 5, definite amber — lift a second spoonful onto the saucer marked stage 5. The caramel smell should be obvious across the room by now. Ask them to write down what they can smell, because that is the evidence that matters.
- Take it to stage 6 — dark going black, sharp bitter smell, first wisps of smoke — then switch off and slide the pan off the element. Do not chase a blacker result. Once smoke appears you have what you need.
- While it cools, the two saucers go round the room on a tray, not in hands. Five minutes is enough for them to set hard. Nobody tastes anything.
- Leave the pan to cool completely before it goes near water. Hot sugar and water spits.
Thermometer stays out of the sugar. Molten sugar is over 180 °C, it sticks to the probe and drags hot sugar with it when you lift it. The temperatures in this lesson come from the chocolate and the egg, not the sugar.
The stages
| Stage | What is happening | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cold sugar | White, grainy, separate crystals. Smells of almost nothing. |
| 2 | Edges go clear | The outside turns glassy and starts to run. Still colourless. |
| 3 | All liquid | Clear, runny, like syrup. Bubbles at the edges. |
| 4 | First colour | A straw tint creeping in. The smell begins to change. |
| 5 | Amber | Definite brown. Strong caramel smell across the room. |
| 6 | Dark | Deep brown going black. Sharp, bitter smell. First wisps of smoke. |
The test
A spoonful is taken out at stage 3 and left to cool. Another is taken out at stage 5.
Once they are cool: which one is still sugar?
- What did the stage 3 sample look like once it cooled?
- What did the stage 5 sample look like?
- Which stage did you mark as the point of no return, and why?
- The sugar got liquid at stage 3 and it got liquid at stage 5. Why is only one of those reversible?
- If you kept heating past stage 6, would you ever get sugar back?
Show the answers
1. Hard, clear or slightly cloudy, glassy. It looks different from the grainy powder it started as, but it is still sugar — it tastes of sugar and nothing new has been made.
2. Hard, brown, and it smells of caramel rather than of nothing. It is not sugar any more.
3. Somewhere between stage 4 and stage 5. The evidence to look for is more than one thing at once: the colour changed and the smell changed and it does not go back.
4. At stage 3 the sugar changed state — same substance, different form, and cooling reverses it. By stage 5 the heat has broken the sugar apart and built new substances, which is why it smells different. A change of state can be undone. A new substance cannot be un-made.
5. No. It keeps decomposing until what is left is mostly carbon — the black stuff. Every step takes it further away.
- Use the sheet with the stages already listed.
- Tick what you notice, then mark one transition point.
- Record at every stage.
- Mark the transition and write your evidence.
- Argue that the transition happened one stage earlier or later than the class agreed, and defend it.
Two thresholds 15 min
Now two different substances — and this time we measure the temperature.
Heated gently in a metal dish with the thermometer in it. Call out when it starts to go.
Then it comes off the heat and cools.
At what temperature did it melt?
Heated gently with the thermometer in it. Call out the moment it turns white.
Then it comes off the heat and cools.
At what temperature did it set?
Running the two temperature demonstrations — step by step
On the bench: the frypan on low, two small metal dishes, one digital thermometer per dish if you have two, a few pieces of broken chocolate, one egg white in a cup, and a spoon. Same exclusion line, students seated.
Chocolate first — about 5 minutes
- Three or four small pieces in the metal dish, thermometer probe resting in among them, dish into the frypan on low. Low matters: chocolate scorches and then you are demonstrating the wrong change.
- Read the temperature aloud every thirty seconds and have them write the numbers as you go.
- The moment the pieces lose their edges and slump, call the temperature. Expect somewhere between 34 and 38 °C. That is the number that goes on their sheet.
- Dish out of the pan, onto the mat. Say you will come back to it — it needs a few minutes to set again, and it will.
Egg white second — about 6 minutes
- A tablespoon of egg white into the second dish, probe in the middle of it, into the frypan on low.
- Read the temperature aloud as it climbs. It will sit around 50-something for a while and look like nothing is happening. Let that silence run — the contrast with what comes next is the point.
- The instant it turns opaque white, call the temperature. Expect about 63 °C. Write it on the board beside 100 °C for boiling water, and leave both numbers there through CP1.
- Out of the pan, onto the mat, next to the chocolate.
Then show both — the chocolate has hardened again, and the egg has not gone anywhere. Carry them round on the tray. That side-by-side is what makes the point, so do not skip it for time.
If a thermometer reads oddly, say so rather than adjusting the number. An honest "that reading does not look right, let's take it again" is worth more than a tidy figure, and Week 5 is built on trusting your instrument.
Put the numbers up
| Change | Temperature | Did it come back? |
|---|---|---|
| Chocolate melted | ||
| Egg white set | ||
| Water boils | 100 °C | Yes — steam condenses back to water |
- Which of these needed the least heat?
- Which one is permanent?
- The egg set at a lower temperature than boiling water. So why can you un-boil water but not un-cook an egg?
- Does knowing the temperature tell you whether a change is reversible?
Show the answers
1. The chocolate, somewhere around 34–38 °C. Body temperature is 37 °C, so it melts at roughly the temperature of your own mouth — which is exactly why it melts in your hand and on your tongue.
2. The egg white, at around 63 °C. Still well below boiling.
3. Because boiling only changes water's state — it is still water, whether liquid or steam, and cooling brings it straight back. Cooking the egg builds something new out of what was there. Cooling cannot un-build it.
4. No. Not on its own. Temperature tells you how much energy went in. What happens depends on the substance and on which of its thresholds that energy crosses.
An egg cannot be un-cooked at a temperature where water is still perfectly happy being liquid.
Consolidate 10 min
Amend the chart
Four weeks ago you listed the evidence that something new has been made. In Week 2 you added the mass changed. Today it changes again.
- Should it got hot stay on the list as evidence of a new substance?
- What would you replace it with?
Where this is going
Heat on its own is not evidence — ice melts when it is heated and nothing new is made. What today showed is subtler and more useful:
Adding heat can cause either kind of change. What decides it is the substance, and how much energy goes in.
Where we have got to
- To tell whether something new was made, you need more than one piece of evidence.
- Mass is the strongest evidence, because it is a number rather than an opinion.
- The clearest question is still: can we get it back?
- Heat can cause either kind of change. How much you add decides which.
Words we have used
★ Classify and Compare 30 min
Assessment. Individual, silent, books closed.
This covers everything from Week 1 until now.
You are not being tested on remembering. The class charts and your own results from Weeks 2 and 3 stay on display. You are being assessed on whether you can classify a change and say what evidence decided it — and whether you can compare two changes properly.
What is on the paper
- Part A — eight changes to classify, each with the one piece of evidence that decided it. A tick with no evidence does not count.
- Part B — compare one reversible and one irreversible change that you investigated yourself in this unit.
- Part C — the cross at our entrance.
Next week
The biggest lesson of the unit. The jars come apart, the nails go on the good scales, and something happens to the numbers that nobody is expecting. Then you get the other class's data and have to find what is wrong with it.
Resources
Print before the lesson.
PDF All student sheets Both versions of the escalation sheet in one file.